Water Rating for the Galeo Pro Trailer GPS Tracker
Question:
The description of the GALEO Pro GA94FR says it is IP96K waterproof. I can find no reference anywhere to IP96K. Should it instead be IP69K?
asked by: Sam S
0
Expert Reply:
The Galeo Pro Trailer GPS Tracker # GA94FR has the IP69K water rating you're asking about. I'm not seeing an IP96K listing anywhere either so IP69K is the correct rating.
expert reply by:
Jon G
0
Product Page this Question was Asked From
Galeo Pro Trailer GPS Tracker - Anti-Theft Alarm and Motion Sensor
- Trailer GPS Tracker
- Universal Kit
- Tracking Service Not Included
- 3 - 5 Years
- - 40 F to 185 F
- 5-1/4L x 3-1/4W x 1-5/8T Inch
- Galeo
more information >
Continue Researching
- Q&A: Does Galeo Pro GPS Tracking Device Update Tracking Automatically
- Shop: Galeo Pro Trailer GPS Tracker - Anti-Theft Alarm and Motion Sensor
- Search Results: tracker
- Search Results: gps tracker
- Shop: Linxup GPS Tracking Device - 3-3/4" Long x 2" Wide x 1" Tall
- Q&A: Does the Galeo Pro GPS Tracking Device Require a Service Plan?
- Q&A: Replacement Key 706 For Bauer 700 Series Locks
- Q&A: Galeo Pro GPS Tracking Device Service Plan Price
- Q&A: Is The Battery On The Galeo Pro GPS Tracking Device # GA94FR Replaceable?
- Article: Towing a Trailer? Let's Talk About Brake Controllers
- Article: Snow Tire Chains Explained: How Tire Chains Work & When to Use Them
- Q&A: Best Weight Distribution Hitch System For a ATC Trailer With 2" X 8" Tall Frame Rails
- Article: How to Choose a Battery Charger
- Article: Most Popular Wheel Bearings
- Article: The Best Trailer Tongue Locks for Preventing Trailer Theft
- Article: Trailer Wiring Diagrams
- Q&A: Replacement Axle for 1969 Aristocrat Trailer With 4" Drop Spindle and Electric Brakes
- Article: Wiring Trailer Lights with a 7-Way Plug (It's Easier Than You Think)
Sam S.
2/14/2024
On the description page of the etrailer web site, the water resistance rating is listed in two places. One near the top of the page says IP69K. The other near the bottom of the page still lists the rating as IP96K as of 2/14/24, which is apparently a typographical error.